Future of Wealth management Platforms

The Customers don’t care about the platforms; all they care about is the services, experience and the reliability of the platform. 

Wealth management firms can no more compete on price, they are moving towards the value of outcome

Based on the key drivers of the wealth management business, below is the proposed business architecture for the wealth management firms in order to maintain the competitive advantage.

Forward thinking firms are combining both the client facing and back office technology to support multiple client and advisor segments

WM5

Making the customer experience and applying technology to improve it across various platforms would drive the long-term loyalty of the customer. The consistent customer experience across the various line of business is the key driver.

Wealth management firms struggle with silos of each product offering, as there is no integration with the front office to the back office application, making it difficult to maintain consistency – IBOR & PBOR solution would help them cover come the current problem

Apart from the customer wealth management advisory firms also needs real-time information and new ways of advisory life-cycle management, which would play an important role in getting more business and as the business grows, need to more sophisticated platform grows.

As the retail wealth management advisory models evolve to reflect increasing needs of the clients they bring more value added services to the clients, the firms at the same time need to keep a tap on the price of the wealth management platforms.

Today the clients are better informed and more technically capable than ever before, with the advances in consumer technology and the 24/7 news cycle enable seamless and almost limitless access to markets information to the clients makes it more and more difficult for the traditional wealth management advisory firms

Deepdive – Wealth Management Ecosystem

There are various business models that operate in retail wealth management, some firms offer a specific business model whereas other firms operate on multiple business models giving the customers the flexibility to choose the business model that suits best to their needs.

No model is likely to dominate the global wealth management because they are designed around different target customers

Primarily there are three main types of business models – Universal banks, Platform players and Private Banks and Brokerages. Various Broker affiliated advisors, RIA (Fee-based business), Hybrid and Dual registration, Robo Advisors etc. use full-service firms, Banks, Independent broker-dealers, Self-directing firms, self-clearing firms, discount brokerages, global financial firms etc. some of these business models are explained in details below.

The Business models differ from country to country and the challenges of different business models are similar. It is a difference in the regulatory regimes of the country. The customization of their services for the national markets and selection of products based on the maturity of the maturity of markets

WM1

Key Players

Traditionally, the industry was dominated by private banks and stockbrokers. But there were important regional differences in the dominant types of player. To some extent, this reflected differences in the structure and regulation of the financial services industry as a whole. Broadly, there are two main models:

  • North American model, where the industry is dominated by full-service and discount brokerages and money managers, whose strengths lie in the investment area, rather than in traditional deposit gathering, as noted above, the traditional emphasis here is on a (transaction driven) commission-based business model.
  • The European model, where universal and traditional private banks dominate, due to their ability to offer a comprehensive range of wealth management products and services. The emphasis here is on a fee-based business model.

 

WM2

 

Registered Investment Advisors (RIA)

These investment advisors (IA) are registered with SEC under the Investment adviser’s act of 1940 in the USA. An IA must adhere to a fiduciary standard of care laid out in the US Investment Advisers Act of 1940. This standard requires IAs to act and serve a client’s best interests with the intent to eliminate, or at least to expose, all potential conflicts of interest which might incline an investment adviser—consciously or unconsciously—to render advice which was not in the best interest of the IA’s clients . It is one of the fastest-growing sectors, benefiting from advisor and asset migration away from wirehouses. Strong client relationships, supported by product and operational support from large-scale platform providers.

The vast majority of broker-dealer firms serving retail clients also operate a separate RIA firm, which we refer to as a corporate RIA. The assets managed by corporate RIAs are not included in the independent RIA subsegment; rather, assets managed under a corporate RIA structure are rolled up under each broker-dealer firm’s subsegment. Representative firms in the independent RIA subsegment include Oxford Financial Group, Shepherd Kaplan, and Appleton Partners.

 Digital advisors/Robo-Advisors

Over recent years, a number of web-based advisors have emerged. They offer above-average advisory quality and act as a gateway to third-party product providers. They are Innovative providers leveraging technology, social media, and communities to attract younger and self-directed investors Data aggregation is a key value proposition of this new breed of Financial Advisors.

Family offices

They serve the very wealthiest clients, acting as an integrated hub for the family’s financial administration. They perform, essentially, three main functions:

  • Specialist advise and planning (including financial, tax, strategic and philanthropic);
  • Investment management (including asset allocation, risk management, investment due diligence and analysis, discretionary asset management and trading); and
  • Administration (including coordination of relationships with financial services providers and consolidated financial reporting).

A family office may be dedicated either to a single family or serve a small number of families. Some of the major private banks, such as Pictet and JP Morgan, have developed their own multifamily offices, but the vast majority are independent specialists (and have, in some instances, evolved from single family offices). Family offices are particularly well-developed in the US and are starting to evolve in Europe

Private Banks

 Is a broad category of players that includes the classic Swiss private banking partnership, mainly targeting HNWIs, these institutions offer clients end-to-end capabilities via a relationship with a senior banker (the relationship manager) that is confidential and founded on trust.

Retail and universal banks

They target affluent clients who need comprehensive advice and who value a close banking relationship and the emphasis is on ‘farming’ their existing customer base, including business banking clients. Examples include Citigroup, HSBC, Bank of America.

Trust banks

Are essentially the US equivalent of the traditional European private bank. Most have their roots in providing trust and custody services but have broadened their product range over the years. They now also provide asset management, insurance and financial, tax and estate planning. Their core target client segment is UHNWIs, but many have also developed tailored propositions for HNWIs

Stockbrokers and Wirehouses

Target self-directed investors and traders for their day-to-day transaction execution and investment needs, they offer low-cost access to a range of investment products as well as to extensive investment research. But they are not exclusively dedicated to affluent clients, do not typically offer much in the way of customized advice and often lack transaction banking products. It is a diverse group, including firms that have their roots in online discount brokering such as E*TRADE, as well as full-service brokers such as Morgan Stanley.

Product specialists

Include hedge funds, private equity funds, mutual funds and structured product providers. Lacking their own captive distribution channels, they manufacture products for distribution across a range of HNW channels, including private banks and financial advisors

Self-clearing retail brokerage (non-Wirehouses)

It refers to a group of large to mid-size national and regional broker-dealer firms (excluding the aforementioned Wirehouses) those clear securities transactions for themselves. Representative firms in this sub-segment include Edward Jones, Ameriprise, RBC Wealth Management, and Raymond James.

Fully disclosed retail brokerage

This refers to all broker-dealer firms that utilize another broker-dealer to clear securities transactions on their behalf (with the exception of some fully disclosed discount and online brokers, which are included in the discount and online brokerage subsegment). Fully disclosed broker-dealers are also referred to as introducing broker-dealer firms. Sample firms in this subsegment include Commonwealth Financial Network, First Allied Securities, and NFP Securities.

Discount and online brokerage

This subsegment refers to broker-dealer firms that cater to self-directed investors by offering low-cost securities execution. The majority of firms in this subsegment engage with clients via a Website. Representative firms in this segment include divisions of Fidelity, Charles Schwab, and TD Ameritrade.

Investor Categorization

Wealth management clients are changing and they are growing in number and in complexity and based on the global financial assets they have been categorized as HNW/UHNW, Mass affluent and Retail customer.  In order to categorize the customer net worth, the assets like cash and deposit, equity and bonds, mutual funds, alternative investments and IRA are considered. Some of the assets like the residential real estate, occupational pension assets and household debt are not considered.

WM3

 

 

Robo-Advisory vs. Human Advisors

A simple question

If you had a problem or a goal in mind, would you want a series of checkboxes, questions, telephone prompts or a real person to assist you?

The automated response system may include perhaps a dozen issues and solutions, based on algorithms, which are supposed to meet the needs of most people. A real person can give you real-time responses, specific to your questions when asked with accurate answers.

The financial advising industry has been buzzing about the emergence of Robo-advisors for the past few years as web-based advising companies, with the new technology stack most of these companies like the Vanguard’s, Wealth-front, bigdecision.com, etc. have either acquired or developed Robo advisory platforms, spending millions of dollars. These online tools attempt to create and manage a client’s portfolio in a fast and inexpensive way.

Why and How Robo-advisors came into existence?

Historically the problem with trying to get an FIA was many have minimum asset requirements of $500,000 or larger and it is not uncommon for FIAs to charge 1-2% annually (or greater via the loaded investment tools like Mutual funds entry and exit loads). That is 1-2% you have to do better than the market just to keep up.

On the other hand, Robo-advisors manage portfolios automatically, with their decisions driven by the algorithm. Most Robo-advisors include portfolio rebalancing. One, Fidelity’s http://www.futureadvisor.com, would do the tax harvesting and reallocation for you for a 0.5 percent annual fee.

How Robo-advisors do it differently.

Let me try an explain using a simple example

When you do to buy a pair of denim, you essentially speak to the sales guy and just mention the waist size and the fit. They give you an option of 5 types of denim from different companies, but the ultimate decision is yours that which one you want to buy; this is similar to human FIA.

On the other hand you entered a showroom and based on your physical appearance and your choice the computer takes out the best denim suitable for you, now that is Robo advisory. The Robo-advisory work on a concept of “One Size that fits most of the people”

The computer is learning every time based on the historical data, assets performance, your choices and choices made by other individuals having similar risk appetite. The Robo-advisor changes the asset allocation automatically, where the investor does not have to make the asset allocation decision every time all that at very low fees compared to the human FIA.

Typically, these types of accounts can be compared with the Managed accounts that FIA manages wherein the FIA gets an amount from the investor, and the FIA takes the decision based on the market dynamics, the investment decision or asset allocation are completely based on the FIA experience. FIA may charge the end customers a standard fee 1-2% and a percentage of net profit of the portfolio.

Does Robo-advisor suit you and your dad both?

Firms like Betterment.com focus on the end-goal and is ideal for individuals who do not care or want to learn about the details of investing. For these people, the 35 basis points (or less) they pay is well worth the fee, and in many cases much better than hiring an FIA — both regarding cost and sound financial advice.

In my case, most of my assets are “Do it yourself” (DIY), but I’ve also been studying this for years and feel comfortable buying insurance, mutual funds and stocks myself. On the other hand, my dad may not log-in to his online account and would call up his FIA and get his insurance done.

Most of the Robo advisory platforms work on the Modern Portfolio Theory and the tools robot-advisors offer aren’t new, however. Traditional financial advisors had the same tools available to them for years and could roll up a personalized asset allocation plan unique to you.

How to choose a Robo-advisor for yourself or family, what things you need to consider?

Below are some of the parameters that you should consider while choosing a Robo-advisor and compare it with the Human FIA

  • Minimum Deposit – Some firms you can start out with nothing and others require sizable amounts to start with.
  • Annual Fees – Be aware of hidden costs, portfolio management fees, mutual fund entry/exit loads, ULIP management fees etc.
  • Asset Allocation – Does it offer all different products like Insurance, Mutual funds, Stocks etc.
  • Account Type Support – 100% automated vs human assisted advice
  • Tax Optimization – Does it give services like Tax-Loss Harvesting, Tax planning, Tax reclaims etc.
  • Retirement planning only or supports other short term goal based planning
  • Managed by you in which they give trading advice, or directly by the firm
  • Manage all your assets or just a portion

Although there are a few obvious perks/benefits of the Robo-advisor model, there are undeniable advantages that human, financial advisors bring to their clients. The Gen X may feel comfortable using an online tool to manage their money; however, when it comes to taking major decisions involving larger some of money and longer commitments they like to ripe for a face-to-face financial advisor.

I think, looking at the current capital markets and availability of Robo/RIA tools, and the individual investors the hybrid approach is would be appropriate where the Robo-advisors take over the day to day portfolio’s asset allocations, and the humans take up when building a new wealth management portfolio for an investor.

—————————–

Abhinav Gupta

Certified Financial Planner (CFP)

Original Article (PDF)

ROBO VS HUMAN Article